<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future is in the ability to ignore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lexandera.com/2009/05/the-future-is-in-the-ability-to-ignore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lexandera.com/2009/05/the-future-is-in-the-ability-to-ignore/</link>
	<description>A blog about the web, mobile web, semantic web and mobile semantic web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aleksander Kmetec</title>
		<link>http://lexandera.com/2009/05/the-future-is-in-the-ability-to-ignore/comment-page-1/#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleksander Kmetec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexandera.com/?p=362#comment-1661</guid>
		<description>I still use Google Reader, but only for lesser known blogs that publish quality content in long(ish) intervals. It just doesn&#039;t make sense to subscribe to anything popular because those links get (re)twitted and submitted to reddit/hacker news so often, you come across them several times anyway. And for anything high volume it&#039;s better to just let other people do the filtering for me. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still use Google Reader, but only for lesser known blogs that publish quality content in long(ish) intervals. It just doesn&#8217;t make sense to subscribe to anything popular because those links get (re)twitted and submitted to reddit/hacker news so often, you come across them several times anyway. And for anything high volume it&#8217;s better to just let other people do the filtering for me. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florent V.</title>
		<link>http://lexandera.com/2009/05/the-future-is-in-the-ability-to-ignore/comment-page-1/#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>Florent V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lexandera.com/?p=362#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>I spent a lot of time a year and a half ago searching for a good RSS ”flow“ reader. Something that would let me mark some feeds as important (and then display a unread count), and let all other feeds in pools of “take a look at that if you fancy a read”. The only reader i found that met that description was an experiment by a lone developer, and it was left unmaintained. I finally used Google Reader, only to abandon it. At that time, i started using Twitter.

This summer, i finally pulled the plug on Google Reader. I don&#039;t know if RSS is dead, but old RSS readers are.

One other thing that killed RSS readers for me: the awesomebar in Firefox 3. When i want to check out a webcomic such as Girls With Slingshots, Questionable Content, xkcd or Dinosaur Comics, i type Ctrl+L (focus the address bar), then &quot;gws&quot;, &quot;ques&quot;, &quot;xk&quot; or &quot;dino&quot;, Tab key, Enter. It&#039;s quick. RSS reader relieved us of the hassle of checking each site. Except that sometimes checking a site is NOT an hassle, it&#039;s a pleasure. And if the browser makes it awfully easy to get to that site, the advantages of RSS readers become thinner.

I guess RSS readers are still great for information junkies, journalists or researchers who need to monitor some RSS-enabled sources of information and publications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent a lot of time a year and a half ago searching for a good RSS ”flow“ reader. Something that would let me mark some feeds as important (and then display a unread count), and let all other feeds in pools of “take a look at that if you fancy a read”. The only reader i found that met that description was an experiment by a lone developer, and it was left unmaintained. I finally used Google Reader, only to abandon it. At that time, i started using Twitter.</p>
<p>This summer, i finally pulled the plug on Google Reader. I don&#8217;t know if RSS is dead, but old RSS readers are.</p>
<p>One other thing that killed RSS readers for me: the awesomebar in Firefox 3. When i want to check out a webcomic such as Girls With Slingshots, Questionable Content, xkcd or Dinosaur Comics, i type Ctrl+L (focus the address bar), then &#8220;gws&#8221;, &#8220;ques&#8221;, &#8220;xk&#8221; or &#8220;dino&#8221;, Tab key, Enter. It&#8217;s quick. RSS reader relieved us of the hassle of checking each site. Except that sometimes checking a site is NOT an hassle, it&#8217;s a pleasure. And if the browser makes it awfully easy to get to that site, the advantages of RSS readers become thinner.</p>
<p>I guess RSS readers are still great for information junkies, journalists or researchers who need to monitor some RSS-enabled sources of information and publications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
